Buy on Amazon
€379.64
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $549
Availability
MSRP in USD: $549
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $383
Availability
MSRP in USD: $383
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Core i7-4702MQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1557 days newer than Core i7-4702MQ.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Tanks than Core i7-4702MQ - 526 vs 519 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4702MQ - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4702MQ
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 37 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
526
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen ™ Threadripper 1900X, S TR4, 8 core, 16 fili, 3,8 GHz, 4,0 GHz Turbo, 20 MB, 64 linee, 180 W, CPU, vendita al dettaglio
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61800 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Core i7-4702MQ
Mobile • May 27th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i7-4702MQ |
|---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | May 27th, 2013 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket G3 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 37 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.