Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 730 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €37.45 vs €379.64
- Up to 90% better value when playing Grand Theft Auto V than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.3 vs €3.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 51 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
124
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€37.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €37.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |