Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 215 days older than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 6% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G4900 - 119 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 54 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
52.73972602739726%
Multi-Core
1051
18.139454608215395%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
| Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
