Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2150 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 5% better in Halo Infinite than FX-4100 - 158 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €22.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 240 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Whitehaven | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |