Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10320.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than Core i3-10320 - 208 vs 202 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €99.0 vs €690.0
- Up to 85% better value when playing Control than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - €0.49 vs €3.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €690 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Buy for €99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raphael | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |