Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 3537 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 22% better in Valheim than FX-4350 - 231 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
231
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€690
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €690 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Raphael | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |