Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 1622 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 25% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 5 2600X - 213 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 69% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - €158.61 vs €520.0
- Up to 62% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen 9 7950X - €0.93 vs €2.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 95 vs 170 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €520 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
171
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€158.61
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €158.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raphael | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 95 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |