Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 3626 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 86% better in Dirt 5 than FX-8320 - 261 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of FX-8320
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 125 vs 170 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
261
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€520
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €520 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 350 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Raphael | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |