Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 3438 days newer than FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 117% better in War Thunder than FX-6350 - 287 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 125 vs 170 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Ryzen 9 7950X
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
| Raphael | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 170 W | TDP | 125 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
