Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 4003 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 9% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than FX-6100 - 241 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 95 vs 170 Watts
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
241
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€520
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €520 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Raphael | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
170 W | TDP | 95 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |