Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 979 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 34% better in Starfield than Core i5-10600 - 82 vs 61 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600 - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Up to 70% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - €179.0 vs €604.34
- Up to 57% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - €2.93 vs €6.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 65 vs 120 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
82
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.83/FPS
42.89897510980967%
Price, €
€604.34
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €604.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
61
74.39024390243902%
Value, €/FPS
€2.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€179
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €179 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1579
55.95322466335932%
Multi-Core
6175
35.32810801533269%
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | vs | Intel Core i5-10600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raphael | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
44.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |