Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 3422 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 22% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4130 - 218 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 95% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900 - €18.23 vs €372.0
- Up to 94% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 9 7900 - €0.1 vs €1.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900 - 54 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €372 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Buy for €18.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 14th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raphael | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |