Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7845HX outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7845HX is 3040 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
- Performs up to 27% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 155 vs 122 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 24 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 9 7845HX
Mobile • Jan 4th, 2023
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Dragon Range | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket FL1 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Radeon 610M | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
