Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 6900HX outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 6900HX is 2690 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
- Performs up to 14% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 188 vs 165 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 45 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX - 24 vs 16 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 6900HX
Mobile • Jan 19th, 2022
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Rembrandt | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| AMD Socket FP7 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 12 |
| 16 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 120 W |
6 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Radeon 680M | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
