Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 1402 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-7100T - 453 vs 401 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Core i3-7100T
- Up to 50% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - €155.46 vs €314.00
- Up to 43% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen 9 5950X - €0.39 vs €0.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €314 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
401
89%
Value, €/FPS
€0.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€155.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €155.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 5950X | vs | Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Vermeer | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |