Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Core i7-7820HQ on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 1402 days newer than Core i7-7820HQ.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 15% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-7820HQ - 194 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7820HQ - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820HQ
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€273.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €273.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7647 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X | vs | Intel Core i7-7820HQ |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Vermeer | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 45 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |