Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900 outperforms Xeon E5-2650 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900 is 2318 days newer than Xeon E5-2650 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 215 vs 197 FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 24 vs 20 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen 9 5900
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2021
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Vermeer | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
