Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900 outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900 is 3060 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-4130 - 215 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €378.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76012 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5900 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
Vermeer | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |