Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 4900HS outperforms Core i5-10300H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 4900HS is 194 days older than Core i5-10300H.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS
- Performs up to 0% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i5-10300H - 205 vs 204 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-10300H - 35 vs 45 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10300H - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Ryzen 9 4900HS
Mobile • Mar 7th, 2020
Core i5-10300H
Mobile • Sep 17th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 4900HS | vs | Intel Core i5-10300H |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 17th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Renoir | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 45 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Radeon Graphics 512SP | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | No |
