Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 985 days newer than Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 181 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 105 vs 145 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 44 vs 24 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 9 3900X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Single-Core
1175
69.40342587123449%
Multi-Core
9619
96.79009861139062%
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Matisse | Codename | Broadwell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 12 | Cores | 22 |
| 24 | Threads | 44 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 145 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
