Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 648 days older than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 43% better in League of Legends than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U - 140 vs 98 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U - 64 vs 8 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Single-Core
866
96.75977653631284%
Multi-Core
2541
40.81927710843373%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
Apr 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | EPYC |
| Picasso | Codename | Naples |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 8 | Threads | 64 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 180 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 10 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
