Buy on Amazon
€60.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X is 667 days newer than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G3900 - 214 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
211
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.9
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron g3900 2,80 gHz LGA1151 2 MB Cache Tray
Buy for €60.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
Desktop • Jun 29th, 2017
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
