Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is 177 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G3930 - 125 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €63.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65399 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
59.90147783251232%
Multi-Core
1043
21.25968202201386%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |