Buy on Amazon
€72.66
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 outperforms Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is 1669 days newer than Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
- Performs up to 21% better in Starfield than Celeron G1610 - 52 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1610
Buy for €72.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65401 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Desktop • Jun 29th, 2017
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
41.970443349753694%
Multi-Core
739
15.063187933143091%
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Summit Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.