Buy on Amazon
€23
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $399
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800XT outperforms Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800XT is 2864 days newer than Core i3-3240.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT
- Performs up to 12% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-3240 - 173 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
BQTEC Intel Core i3-3240 3.40 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread 3 MB Cache 55 W CPU Processore LGA 1155
Buy for €23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75917 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Ryzen 7 3800XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3240
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
554
31.513083048919228%
Multi-Core
1137
13.406437920056597%
AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Matisse | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 105 W | TDP | 55 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
