Buy on Amazon
€290.43
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $399
Availability
MSRP in USD: $399
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3800X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3800X is 1763 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
- Performs up to 27% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 404 vs 319 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 105 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 7 3800X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
404
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€290.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X Processori Socket AM4 (3.9Ghz+32Mb)
Buy for €290.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 7 3800X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Xeon E5-1620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Matisse | Codename | Haswell-E/EP |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Ryzen 7 3800X or Xeon E5-1620 v3
Counter-Strike 2, 1920 x 1080, Very High
207 FPS
€7.24/FPS
Radeon RX 6600
Ryzen 7 3800X
32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 3 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
€1,499
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
