Buy on Amazon
€255.58
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $3226
Availability
MSRP in USD: $3226
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Xeon E5-2698 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 1763 days newer than Xeon E5-2698 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 5% better in DOOM Eternal than Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 499 vs 473 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 - 65 vs 135 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 32 vs 16 threads
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
499
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€255.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, processore Wraith Prism per dissipatore di calore (32 MB, 8 core, velocità 4,4 GHz, 65 W)
Buy for €255.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1720 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Xeon E5-2698 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2698 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Matisse | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 8 | Cores | 16 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 135 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Ryzen 7 3700X or Xeon E5-2698 v3
DOOM Eternal, 1920 x 1080, Nightmare
246 FPS
€5.04/FPS
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Ryzen 7 3700X
32 GB, 480 GB SSD + 1.953125 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
€1,239
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
