Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 3101 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2400.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 21% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-2400 - 111 vs 92 FPS
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i5-2400 - €255.58 vs €406.63
- Up to 48% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-2400 - €2.3 vs €4.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
111
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€255.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €255.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7820 minutes ago
Buy for €406.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7820 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Matisse | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |