Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4130 outperforms Ryzen 7 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4130 is 1953 days older than Ryzen 7 3700U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i3-4130 - 15 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 5% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 7 3700U - 308 vs 293 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
308
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€18.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €18.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Picasso | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 54 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 10 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |