Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the more expensive Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 961 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 1% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-6100 - 129 vs 128 FPS
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i3-6100 - €74.73 vs €168.88
- Up to 56% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-6100 - €0.58 vs €1.32 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 51 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
129
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €74.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
Buy for €168.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 51 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |