Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 2004 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 12% better in Ready or Not than FX-6300 - 262 vs 234 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 48% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700X - €38.99 vs €74.58
- Up to 39% better value when playing Ready or Not than Ryzen 7 2700X - €0.17 vs €0.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 95 vs 105 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €74.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Buy for €38.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |