Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 7 1700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1155 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 7 1700.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 40% better in Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 7 1700 - 56 vs 40 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - €159.18 vs €229.99
- Up to 51% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Ryzen 7 1700 - €2.84 vs €5.75 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 1700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
40
71.42857142857143%
Value, €/FPS
€5.75/FPS
49.391304347826086%
Price, €
€229.99
69%
Buy for €229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
56
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€159.18
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €159.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 495 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |