Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-12100 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 4600G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-12100 is 532 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 4600G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600G
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i3-12100 - €108.2 vs €112.67
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 4600G - 146 vs 134 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 4600G - €0.77 vs €0.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 4600G - 60 vs 65 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
134
91.78082191780823%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
95.06172839506173%
Price, €
€108.2
100%
Buy for €108.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61752 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€112.67
96%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €112.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61753 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Single-Core
1574
73.24336900884131%
Multi-Core
6127
89.09408172168096%
AMD Ryzen 5 4600G | vs | Intel Core i3-12100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 60 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |