Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms Xeon E-2276M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 39 days newer than Xeon E-2276M.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E-2276M - 135 vs 132 FPS
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2276M
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 5 3600X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Xeon E-2276M
Server/Workstation • May 29th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X | vs | Intel Xeon E-2276M |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 29th, 2019 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Matisse | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 12 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 45 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
