Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is 373 days newer than Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
- Performs up to 7% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Ryzen 5 3600 - 194 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 64 vs 12 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
182
93.81443298969072%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€95.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €95.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4044 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1597
96.49546827794562%
Multi-Core
6884
47.21860209890939%
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Matisse | Codename | Castle Peak |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 32 |
12 | Threads | 64 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |