Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 298 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - €104.76 vs €272.66
- Up to 59% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i9-10900F - €0.62 vs €1.51 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 5 3400G - 181 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 20 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
168
92.81767955801105%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€104.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €104.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.51/FPS
41.05960264900662%
Price, €
€272.66
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €272.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1128
67.30310262529832%
Multi-Core
3619
42.95039164490861%
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |