Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 1721 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - €261.39 vs €382.01
- Up to 26% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i7-13700F - €1.09 vs €1.47 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 5 2600X - 259 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 24 vs 12 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
240
92%
Value, €/FPS
€1.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€261.39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16693 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
259
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.47/FPS
74%
Price, €
€382.01
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for €382.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16692 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |