Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600X is 1449 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Performs up to 1% better in F1 22 than Core i3-4150 - 272 vs 268 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - €33.4 vs €261.39
- Up to 88% better value when playing F1 22 than Ryzen 5 2600X - €0.12 vs €0.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600X - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600X doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
272
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.96/FPS
12%
Price, €
€261.39
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7094 minutes ago
Buy for €33.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7095 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |