Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1622 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €84.44 vs €556.88
- Up to 83% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i9-13900KF - €0.38 vs €2.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Death Stranding than Ryzen 5 2600 - 251 vs 222 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
222
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.44
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €84.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13900 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
251
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.22/FPS
17%
Price, €
€556.88
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €556.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13899 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |