Buy on Amazon
€25.22
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2500X is 3409 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Performs up to 21% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Phenom II X4 925 - 521 vs 429 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2500X doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
FPS
429
82.34165067178503%
Value, €/FPS
€0.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.22
100%
Value Winner
Processore CPU AMD Phenom II X4 925 95W 2,8 GHz Quad-Core HDX925WFK4DGI/HDX925WFK4DGM Presa AM3 SENZA VENTOLA
Buy for €25.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32836 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 5 2500X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
29.011786038077968%
Multi-Core
930
24.467245461720598%
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | AMD Phenom II X4 925 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | May 11th, 2009 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | Phenom II X4 |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Deneb |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
