Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2500X outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2500X is 2525 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500X
- Performs up to 3% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-6100 - 172 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 8 vs 6 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 5 2500X
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2018
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
| Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
