Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 1128 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 2400G - 188 vs 180 FPS
- Up to 32% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2400G - €76.36 vs €112.25
- Up to 34% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 2400G - €0.41 vs €0.62 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €112.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€76.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €76.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |