Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 2094 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - €74.44 vs €343.67
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 15% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen 5 1600X - 136 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 24 vs 12 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €74.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
Buy for €343.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1123
42.2021796317174%
Multi-Core
4766
30.79806138933764%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |