Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1995 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €219.96 vs €456.1
- Up to 40% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i9-13900KF - €1.75 vs €2.92 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 24% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Ryzen 5 1600 - 156 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
126
80.76923076923077%
Value, €/FPS
€1.75/FPS
100%
Price, €
€219.96
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €219.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 260 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
156
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.92/FPS
59.93150684931508%
Price, €
€456.1
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for €456.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 620 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Single-Core
1068
35.92330978809283%
Multi-Core
4578
22.7749863190886%
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |