Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 1884 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 24% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-3820 - 318 vs 257 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-3820 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3820
- Up to 33% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600 - €49.99 vs €74.94
- Up to 21% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 1600 - €0.19 vs €0.24 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
257
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Intel Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |