Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1036 days newer than Ryzen 3 PRO 1300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 30% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 - 414 vs 318 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 - 20 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
414
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€338.44
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €338.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1300 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |