Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 1728 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 2% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-6700K - 301 vs 296 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Up to 28% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - €188.88 vs €261.39
- Up to 26% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen 3 3300X - €0.64 vs €0.87 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
301
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
73%
Price, €
€261.39
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
296
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€188.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 196 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Matisse | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |