Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2700K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2700K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 3105 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2700K.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 16% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-2700K - 181 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-2700K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Up to 30% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - €182.45 vs €261.39
- Up to 19% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 3 3300X - €1.17 vs €1.44 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.44/FPS
81%
Price, €
€261.39
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for €261.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
FPS
156
86%
Value, €/FPS
€1.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€182.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €182.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Matisse | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |