Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 601 days newer than Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 14% better in Far Cry 6 than Core i3-9100T - 130 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Ryzen 3 3300X
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Core i3-9100T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-9100T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1203
72.03592814371258%
Multi-Core
3178
54.85931296392198%
AMD Ryzen 3 3300X | vs | Intel Core i3-9100T |
|---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2018 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Matisse | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
