Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 1463 days newer than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 31% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 3 3250U - 149 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 16 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Ryzen 3 3250U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Core i5-14400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 15 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
